Juror in Breonna Taylor grand jury says the whole story is not being told

Spread the love

Whereas audio transcripts have been launched in Oct. 2, juror deliberations and prosecutor suggestions weren’t shared. Calls to first release the grand jury transcripts adopted the Sept. 23 announcement that no costs can be pursued in opposition to the officers concerned within the case.


Final month Cameron claimed that grand jurors agreed that the actions of the officers concerned within the incident have been “justified.” Weeks later a spokesperson for Cameron acknowledged that prosecutors by no means advisable costs in opposition to the officers to the grand jury. Moreover, an nameless juror expressed Tuesday that Cameron’s model of the trial was unfaithful and that the jury was not given the prospect to indict any officer for murder.

“The grand jury did not agree that sure actions have been justified nor did it determine the indictment needs to be the one costs within the Breonna Taylor case,” the juror, recognized as “Grand Juror #1” by legal professional Kevin Glogower, acknowledged. “The grand jury was not given the chance to deliberate on these [other] costs and deliberated solely on what was introduced to them.” They added: “I can’t communicate for different jurors, however I will help the reality be advised.”

Based on the juror’s assertion, the grand jury was solely requested to contemplate three wanton endearment costs in opposition to police detective Brett Hankison who fired his gun into the neighboring house. “Questions have been requested about further costs and the grand jury was advised there can be none as a result of the prosecutors did not really feel they might make them stick.” Based on NBC Information, one other juror represented by Glogower issued a separate assertion that mentioned they have been “happy” with the decide’s order to launch the information and “can be discussing potential subsequent steps with counsel.”

Although Cameron disagreed with the decide’s determination to launch the information, he mentioned he wouldn’t enchantment it. Regardless of his identified lies, he remained assured that he labored effectively. “As Particular Prosecutor, it was my determination to ask for an indictment on costs that might be confirmed underneath Kentucky legislation,” he mentioned in a statement posted to Twitter. “Indictments obtained within the absence of ample proof underneath the legislation don’t arise and usually are not essentially honest to anybody. I stay assured in our presentation to the Grand Jury, and I stand by the staff of attorneys and investigators who devoted months of labor to this case.”

In response to the juror statements, attorneys for the Taylor household are calling for a brand new unbiased prosecutor to look into the case. “We now know what we suspected: Lawyer Normal Daniel Cameron took the choice out of the grand jury’s palms,” attorneys Ben Crump, Sam Aguiar, and Lonita Baker said in a statement on Tuesday.

“It’s a despicable miscarriage of justice that’s disrespectful of the lifetime of Breonna Taylor that AG Cameron white washed what his workplace introduced to the grand jury,” the attorneys mentioned. “This failure rests squarely on the shoulders of Daniel Cameron.”

Leave a Reply